linux-kernel - Re: PATCH] firewire: add padding to some struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <416382875.30185@ustc.edu.cn>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:07:55 +0800
From:	"JiSheng Zhang" <jszhang3@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
To:	stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, krh@...hat.com
Subject: Re: PATCH] firewire: add padding to some struct

Hi,

>From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
>Reply-To: 
>To: JiSheng Zhang <jszhang3@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
>Subject: Re: PATCH] firewire: add padding to some struct
>Date:Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:38:25 +0200
>
>JiSheng Zhang wrote:
> > If p is a pointer to struct fw_cdev_event_response), p->data will point to
the
> > padding data rather than the right place, it will cause problem under some
> > platforms. For example, in the function handle_device_event of
libraw1394(ported
> > to juju stack):
> > .....
> > case FW_CDEV_EVENT_RESPONSE:
> >     rc = u64_to_ptr(u->response.closure);
> >     if (rc->data != NULL)
> > 	memcpy(rc->data, u->response.data, rc->length);//here it will lost the last
four
> > bytes
> >     errcode = juju_to_raw1394_errcode(u->response.rcode);
> > .....
> > 
> > Although this problem can be solved by add the offset to the pointer, but the
> > member:__u32 data[0] lost its original meaning.
> 
> I don't understand what the problem is.  As long as both kernel and
> library use "response.data" or "&response + offsetof(typeof(response),
> data)", they will write and read at the correct location.
>
> There would be a problem if one of the two used "&response +
> sizeof(response)" instead.  Does this happen anywhere?  If so, then
> these places need to be fixed, not the struct definition.
yes, complete_transaction in fw-cdev.c, it queues the response and data.

how about adding __attribute__((packed)) to the two struct definition? It will not
break abi compatibility.

Thanks in advance,
JiSheng


--- old/include/linux/firewire-cdev.h	2008-07-18 16:34:01.181794046 +0800
+++ new/include/linux/firewire-cdev.h	2008-07-18 19:39:16.389293987 +0800
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ struct fw_cdev_event_response {
 	__u32 rcode;
 	__u32 length;
 	__u32 data[0];
-};
+} __attribute__((packed));
 
 /**
  * struct fw_cdev_event_request - Sent on incoming request to an address region
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ struct fw_cdev_event_iso_interrupt {
 	__u32 cycle;
 	__u32 header_length;
 	__u32 header[0];
-};
+} __attribute__((packed));
 
 /**
  * union fw_cdev_event - Convenience union of fw_cdev_event_ types


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/