[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1216384984.28405.36.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:43:03 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: readjust the load whenever task_setprio()
is invoked
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 15:37 -0600, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> The load may change with the priority, so be sure to recompute its value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Right, but in this case we'd need to do the dec/inc load game again
because otherwise we'll skew stuff - see the previuos mail on how
dequeue_task() doesn't actually do that.
Also, it looks like current mainline still has this issue.
OTOH - since prio boosting is a temporal feature, not changing the load
isn't too bad, we ought to get back to where we came from pretty
quickly.
> ---
>
> kernel/sched.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index b046754..c3f41b9 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -4637,6 +4637,7 @@ void task_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
> p->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;
>
> p->prio = prio;
> + set_load_weight(p);
>
> // trace_special_pid(p->pid, __PRIO(oldprio), PRIO(p));
> prev_resched = _need_resched();
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists