linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: do not stop ticks when cpu is not idle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807181548290.4316@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:52:09 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	eric miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jack Ren <jack.ren@...vell.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: do not stop ticks when cpu is not idle

On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * eric miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > Issue: the sched tick would be stopped in some race conditions.
> 
> > --- a/kernel/sched.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> > @@ -4027,7 +4027,8 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
> >  		rq->nr_switches++;
> >  		rq->curr = next;
> >  		++*switch_count;
> > -
> > +		if (rq->curr != rq->idle)
> > +			tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick();
> >  		context_switch(rq, prev, next); /* unlocks the rq */
> 
> applied to tip/sched/urgent, thanks Eric.
> 
> Thomas, Peter, Dmitry, do you concur with the analysis? (commit below) 

Yes. I did not understand the issue when Jack pointed it out to me,
but with Erics explanation it's really clear. Thanks for tracking that
down.

> It looks a bit ugly to me in the middle of schedule() - is there no wait 
> to solve this within kernel/time/*.c ?

Hmm, yes. I think the proper fix is to enable the tick stop mechanism
in the idle loop and disable it before we go to schedule. That takes
an additional parameter to tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(), but we then
gain a very clear section where the nohz mimic can be active.

I'll whip up a patch.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/