[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4880A613.1060002@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:17:55 -0500
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Richard Kennedy <richard@....demon.co.uk>
CC: penberg@...helsinki.fi, mpm@...enic.com,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] slub: increasing order reduces memory usage of some
key caches
Richard Kennedy wrote:
> Slabcache: dentry Aliases: 0 Order : 0 Objects: 22553
> ** Reclaim accounting active
>
> Sizes (bytes) Slabs Debug Memory
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Object : 208 Total : 1188 Sanity Checks : Off Total: 4866048
> SlabObj: 208 Full : 1186 Redzoning : Off Used : 4691024
> SlabSiz: 4096 Partial: 0 Poisoning : Off Loss : 175024
> Loss : 0 CpuSlab: 2 Tracking : Off Lalig: 0
> Align : 8 Objects: 19 Tracing : Off Lpadd: 171072
So we are using 1188 pages before make
> and after a make kernel & a small delay
2399 pages after make
> on 2.6.26 + my patch
579 * 2 = 1158 (saved 30 pages even before doing anything) before make
> after the make
2025 *2 = 4050 pages which are much more than the 2399 with order 0.
So we are wasting a lot more space. You'd probably need to run slab defrag to get that memory back.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists