[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080718213622.GA14603@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:36:22 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
Cc: yhlu.kernel@...il.com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vgoyal@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Move dma32_reserve_bootmem() after
reserve_crashkernel()
* Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de> wrote:
> On a x86-64 machine (nothing special I could encounter) I had the
> problem that crashkernel reservation with the usual "64M@16M" failed.
> While debugging that, I encountered that dma32_reserve_bootmem()
> reserves a memory region which is in that area.
>
> Because dma32_reserve_bootmem() does not rely on a specific offset but
> crashkernel does, it makes sense to move the dma32_reserve_bootmem()
> reservation down a bit. I tested that patch and it works without
> problems. I don't see any negative effects of that move, but maybe I
> oversaw something ...
>
> While we strictly don't need that patch in 2.6.27 because we have the
> automatic, dynamic offset detection, it makes sense to also include it
> here because:
>
> - it's easier to get it in -stable then,
> - many people are still used to the 'crashkernel=...@...' syntax,
> - not everybody may be using a reloatable kernel.
applied to tip/x86/crashdump, thanks Bernhard.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists