[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0807172249230.22792@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:52:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [git pull] tracing fixes
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Ingo Molnar (4):
> ftrace: fix merge buglet
> ftrace: fix lockup with MAXSMP
> ftrace: do not trace scheduler functions
> ftrace: do not trace library functions
>
[...]
> --- a/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -11,8 +11,6 @@ obj-y = sched.o fork.o exec_domain.o panic.o printk.o profile.o \
> hrtimer.o rwsem.o nsproxy.o srcu.o semaphore.o \
> notifier.o ksysfs.o pm_qos_params.o sched_clock.o
>
> -CFLAGS_REMOVE_sched.o = -mno-spe
> -
> ifdef CONFIG_FTRACE
> # Do not trace debug files and internal ftrace files
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_lockdep.o = -pg
> @@ -21,6 +19,7 @@ CFLAGS_REMOVE_mutex-debug.o = -pg
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_rtmutex-debug.o = -pg
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_cgroup-debug.o = -pg
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_sched_clock.o = -pg
> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_sched.o = -mno-spe -pg
> endif
>
Ingo,
Why not trace the scheduler functions? I found a lot of useful information
from seeing what functions are being called (namely the latencies caused
by the fair scheduler balancing). Not being able to trace sched.c seems to
keep a lot of useful data from being accessed.
also, is the '-mno-spe' save when ftrace is not configured?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists