linux-kernel - Re: [bug, netconsole, SLUB] BUG skbuff_head

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19f34abd0807180003m7bdf832g141777751d7ea563@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:03:50 +0200
From:	"Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To:	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, penberg@...helsinki.fi, rjw@...k.pl
Subject: Re: [bug, netconsole, SLUB] BUG skbuff_head_cache: Poison overwritten

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:03 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>> >
>> > A regression to v2.6.26:
>> >
>> > I started getting this skb-head corruption message today, on a T60
>> > laptop with e1000:
>> >
>> > PM: Removing info for No Bus:vcs11
>> > device: 'vcs11': device_create_release
>> > =============================================================================
>> > BUG skbuff_head_cache: Poison overwritten
>> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > INFO: 0xf658ae9c-0xf658ae9c. First byte 0x6a instead of 0x6b
>>
>> 1. Notice the range. It's just a single byte.
>> 2. Notice the value. It's just a ++.
>
> It's supposed to be 0x6b, this would be a "--"

You're right! Oops. In my defence, I wrote that at 2 AM last night ;-)

> Also it (more likely IMHO) could be clearing a flag with the value 0x01.

It could be. But like I said in a later e-mail, the thing is likely
sk_buff->truesize. Which is not a flags variable. It _is_ however, a
counter, which is frequently -= and atomic_sub()ed.

That field is also an int, not a byte like I suggested above. This is
fine, though. "--" on an int can of course legitimately update/change
just the lower byte of an int.

But.. it could also be some random corruption coming from elsewhere.
Maybe even bad RAM (it's just a single bit anyway). But that's less
likely.


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/