[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080719214329.GA836@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 23:43:29 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: APIC: Remove apic_write_around(); use alternatives
* Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 15:49 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
>
> > > Thank you for cleaning this up Yinghai, but this really begs the
> > > question - is having write_atomic REALLY worthwhile?
> >
> > And this thread is about, Maciej's cleanup patch which removed
> > write_atomic completely :)
> >
> > Thanks to Maciej who posted this fix. It was on my todo list for
> > sometime now!
>
> Awesome! I just felt the need to use 'flaming crap' in a sentence
> today, and broken APICs seemed like an easy target. Glad to know it's
> gone.
it's gone, but without breaking or limiting old hardware: it's done by
moving the code into a quirk. And that's the general direction which we
want to take in such cases - move ugly non-standard stuff into
low-maintenance-overhead quirks.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists