[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080719214944.GC836@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 23:49:44 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: APIC: Remove apic_write_around(); use alternatives
* Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 04:04:29PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Suresh Siddha
> > <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 03:51:07PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Suresh Siddha
> > >> <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> > >> > Thanks to Maciej who posted this fix. It was on my todo list for
> > >> > sometime now!
> > >>
> > >> do we rebase tip/x86/x2apic or rework this patch?
> > >
> > > Ingo just did the merge. And I posted a missing piece. So is this enough?
> >
> > maciej, patch will go first, and x2apic will goes later, so bisect on
> > x2apic will be broken.
>
> hm, ok. Ingo? should I send the rebased 30 or so patches. or we can
> move this patch later.
hm, yes, please send the rebased patches - as this stuff has some risks
so bisectability is important.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists