linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for July 18: warning at kernel/lockdep.c:2068 trace_hardirqs_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080719221723.GB5578@suse.de>
Date:	Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:17:23 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Cc:	Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...land.pl>,
	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 18: warning at kernel/lockdep.c:2068
	trace_hardirqs_on_caller

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 02:59:12PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com> wrote:
> > What I don't get here is how SLUB can be used this early in the boot
> > process. Notice that this is still miles away from the
> >
> >    SLUB: Genslabs=12, HWalign=128, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=1, Nodes=1
> >
> > line, which comes much later. And that kobject_init() _is_ calling
> > kzalloc() via verify_dynamic_kobject_allocation(). Isn't this an
> > error?
> >
> > (Unfortunately, my "git log" doesn't turn up any recent changes for
> > any of the affected code paths here.)
> 
> Ehe... and this is the reason why: The code was added by this patch:
> 
> commit 0e3638d1e04040121af00195f7e4628078246489
> Author: Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
> Date:   Thu Mar 16 17:30:16 2006 -0800
> 
>     warn when statically-allocated kobjects are used
> 
> ..which only exists in -next. Is that just a truly ancient patch, or
> did somebody forget to adjust their clock?

It is truely a very old patch, that only lives in my tree, and currently
isn't planned to go to Linus any year soon.

But it has a very long history of living in the -mm tree, and finding
real bugs, it's just not "safe" enough to go to Linus's tree.  Unless
you think it is?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/