linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in blk_recalc_rq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080719.002826.73806419.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp
Cc:	mpatocka@...hat.com, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in
 blk_recalc_rq_segments about VMERGE

From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:18:44 +0900

> BTW, as I've already said, I'm not against removing the vmerge
> accounting from the block layer.

I am also, as stated, not against this.

Fujita-san, please proposage a patch so that we can put this
issue behind us :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/