[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1216596503.3200.24.camel@wirenth>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:28:23 +0100
From: ian <spyro@....com>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ARM Linux Mailing List
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] at91_mci: Enable MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ only when it
actually works
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 13:13 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> It does tend to make a mess of things when you start adding up all the
> gotchas of each and every broken controller out there (it seems like
> every controller decides to violate the spec in their own creative
> way).
True.
> What about David's idea? Reconfiguring the PIN to be a GPIO pin with
> an interrupt shouldn't be that difficult?
If it works its a better solution...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists