[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1216623599.2744.9.camel@jaswinder.satnam>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:29:59 +0530
From: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@...radead.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@...linux.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, rth@...ddle.net,
rmk@....linux.org.uk, hskinnemoen@...el.com, cooloney@...nel.org,
starvik@...s.com, dhowells@...hat.com, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp,
tony.luck@...el.com, takata@...ux-m32r.org, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com, lethal@...ux-sh.org,
chris@...kel.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/22] Introducing asm/syscalls.h
Hello Matthew,
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 00:16 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> sys_fork() does seem to be the worst case scenario. I suspect there's
> similar ones (clone?). I still think it's worth adding them all to
> linux/syscalls.h.
>
I tried my best to make things simpler. I also tried this in :-
[PATCH 17/22] sh: Introducing asm/syscalls.h
[PATCH 21/22] x86: Introducing asm/syscalls.h
For same architecture it looks complex for 32 and 64 bit.
You can Imagine how linux/syscalls.h will look if we add all
architectures in it.
And you can imagine what will be size of linux/syscalls.h. As more than
60% of arch dependent syscalls have totally different prototypes.
Thank you,
Jaswinder Singh.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists