[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807210957060.24625@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:57:26 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: jgarzik@...ox.com, raisch@...ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c: Release mutex in error
handling code
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
The mutex is released on a successful return, so it would seem that it
should be released on an error return as well.
The semantic patch finds this problem is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression l;
@@
mutex_lock(l);
... when != mutex_unlock(l)
when any
when strict
(
if (...) { ... when != mutex_unlock(l)
+ mutex_unlock(l);
return ...;
}
|
mutex_unlock(l);
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
---
diff -u -p a/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c b/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
--- a/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
@@ -2937,9 +2937,9 @@ static void ehea_rereg_mrs(struct work_s
}
}
}
- mutex_unlock(&dlpar_mem_lock);
- ehea_info("re-initializing driver complete");
+ ehea_info("re-initializing driver complete");
out:
+ mutex_unlock(&dlpar_mem_lock);
return;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists