linux-kernel - Re: EINTR under Linux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <517f3f820807210343m999957crcbba3c7843c0eae9@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:43:45 +0200
From:	"Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To:	"Robert Hancock" <hancockr@...w.ca>
Cc:	akineko <akineko@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: EINTR under Linux

On 7/18/08, Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca> wrote:
> akineko wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a socket program that is running flawlessly under Solaris.
> > When I re-compiled it under Linux (CentOS 5.1) and run it, I got the
> > following error:
> >
> > recv() failed: Interrupted system call
> >
> > This only occurs very infrequently (probably one out of a million
> > packets exchanged).
> >
> > select() in my program is getting EINTR.
> >
> > From the postings I found in the news group seem suggesting that it is
> > due to GC.
> >
> >
> > > The GC sends signals to each thread which causes them all to enter a
> stop-the-world state.  When the GC
> > > is finished,  all the threads are resumed.  When the threads are
> resumed, any that were blocked in a
> > > blocking system call (like poll()) will return with EINTR.  Normally you
> would just retry the system call.
> > >
> >
> > So, I added to check if the errno == EINTR and now my program seems
> > working fine.
> >
> > //
> >
> > My question I would like to ask in this group is:
> > Does this mean any system call under Linux could return empty-hand
> > with EINTR due to GC?
> > I usually assume fatal if system call returns -1.
> > It is quite painful to check all system-call return status.
> >
> > My second question is:
> > Does this can occur in other OS's? (free-BSD, Solaris, ...)
> > Or, is this specific to Linux OS?
> >
>
>  I'm not sure what the GC you're referring to is, but I assume it's using a
> signal handler for that stop signal. If the signal handler is not installed
> with the SA_RESTART flag, then if a system call is interrupted by that
> signal it will get EINTR instead of being restarted automatically. For some
> system calls, EINTR can still occur, for example, see:
>
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908775/xsh/select.html
>
>  This is not Linux specific, but the specs allow for some different behavior
> between UNIX variants.

And the signal.7 page has been very recently updated to include
Linux-specific details for most system calls.  Have a look here:

http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man7/signal.7.html

Basically, recv() is restarted if you use SA_RESTART, but select() is
never restarted, regardless of SA_RESTART (and POSIX.1 allows this).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/