linux-kernel - Re: math_error.7 draft 3, for review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:55:02 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To:	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
cc:	aj@...ell.com, Fabian Kreutz <kreutz@....uni-hannover.de>,
	Andries Brouwer <Andries.Brouwer@....nl>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: math_error.7 draft 3, for review


On Monday 2008-07-21 12:26, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>>  .SH DESCRIPTION
>>  On error, many of the mathematical functions declared in
>>  .IR <math.h>
>>  return a NaN (not a number).
>>  However, rather than looking at the return value

IMHO it looks easier (when directly editing the nroff file)
if you write it inline

	functions decalred in \fI<math.h>\fP return a NaN.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/