[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080721152539.3d8684f9@halley.suse.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:25:39 +0200
From: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, kexec <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...land.pl>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 18: warning at kernel/lockdep.c:2068
trace_hardirqs_on_caller
* Vivek Goyal [2008-07-21 09:17]:
>
> Is /proc/iomem updated upon memory hotplug event.
Yes. I just checked that (yesterday).
I think it would make sense to extend /sys/firmware/memmap on
hot-plugging. Just because on reboot, the firmware will see that
memory, too, and report it. However, we need a way to discriminate the
originally firmware-provided memory map with later added memory. I'm
not sure how that can be done, I have to think about it.
Bernhard
--
Bernhard Walle, SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Architecture Development
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists