lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080721153256.GA13557@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:32:56 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] x86 updates for v2.6.27, phase #2


hm, i just noticed this ugly build warning:

 fs/partitions/efi.c:102:1: warning: "Dprintk" redefined
 In file included from include/asm/smp.h:13,
                 from include/linux/smp.h:28,
                 from include/linux/topology.h:33,
                 from include/linux/mmzone.h:683,
                 from include/linux/gfp.h:4,
                 from include/linux/mm.h:8,
                 from include/linux/pagemap.h:7,
                 from fs/partitions/check.h:1,
                 from fs/partitions/efi.c:95:
 include/asm/apic.h:15:1: warning: this is the location of the previous 
 definition

i'll fix it ... Dprintk in apic.h is historic and ugly. Should i redo 
the tree and the pull request?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ