[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4884AFA3.9070804@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:47:47 -0400
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: iommu fix potential overflow in alloc_iommu()
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:21:39 -0400
> Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
>> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:15:22 -0400
>>> Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> (This didn't appear on LKML or any of the mirrors ... trying again)
>>>>
>>>> It is possible that alloc_iommu()'s boundary_size overflows as
>>>> dma_get_seg_boundary can return 0xffffffff. In that case, further usage of
>>>> boundary_size triggers a BUG_ON() in the iommu code.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Did you actually hit this? pci-gart_64.c is used only by X86_64.
>>>
>>>
>> I hit this by declaring a device struct and not declaring a value for
>> dev->dma_parms->segment_boundary_mask.
>>
>
> What do you mean? You set dev->dma_params but does't set
> dev->dma_parms->segment_boundary_mask? If so, you need to fix your
> code. If you set dev->dma_parms, dma_parms needs to be initialized
> properly.
>
No, I didn't set dev->dma_params.
P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists