[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080721222428.20395240@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:24:28 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Ben Collins <bcollins@...ssdisk.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VT: Restore VT fonts on switch
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:37:35 +0100
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:12:04PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > do you have a list of which ones don't ?
> > >
> > > I don't, but perhaps Matthew does.
> >
> > Perhaps Matthew would care to file X bugs against those that get it wrong
> > then.
>
> It's hardly limited to X. Fonts are set through the kernel - why
> shouldn't it be the kernel's responsibility to ensure that they're
> restored?
Why should it be the kernels problem to clean up after buggy X drivers ?
There are cases the kernel probably should handle font restore: the
obvious one being suspend/resume. X is not one of those cases and wasting
memory on fonts on embedded boxes that will never be seen anyway seems
silly.
For suspend/resume it might be far better to do it in user space,
although I'm not sure what the interface would look like.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists