linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/0] Power domain and clock domain patches for omap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080721222908.GF18909@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:29:08 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/0] Power domain and clock domain patches for omap

On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 06:19:05PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> I'm reposting the series to a wider audience as Russell King suspected that
> other archs may be interested in reviewing these too, or at least some
> parts of the code.

It would be nice to have some comment on these patches from other
people.  My suspicions is that this infrastructure is solving a
problem found on other SoCs in addition to OMAP, and, if this is
useful to other people, it should become cross-SoC infrastructure.

Since I don't know the answer to whether it would be useful, I'm
trying to ensure that these patches have sufficient exposure to
people who _may_ know the answer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/