[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080722061147.GB8303@notebook.homenet.local>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:11:47 +0200
From: Tomas Styblo <tripie@...n.org>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] JMicron JM20337 USB-SATA data corruption bugfix -
device 152d:2338
* Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca> [Tue, 22 Jul 2008]:
>
> In any case, given that your code apparently fixes the corruption it seems
> that srb->result is being set to SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION, but the
> DID_ERROR and SUGGEST_RETRY flags are not being set. Presumably then the
> SCSI layer looks at the sense data and says "hmm, nothing to worry about
> here" and carries on.
That's exactly what I thought was happening, after a cursory
look at the SCSI code.
>
> I think we do need something like your patch, though it should likely be
> moved inside the if (need_auto_sense) check, and I don't see a reason to
> limit to this device ID only.
Thank you. This is a very insidious bug as it doesn't manifest
itself very often, months of data corruption may pass before you
notice it.
So is there a bug in the chipset, or does the error handling code
not follow specifications?
I wonder if the company that makes the chipset should be notified
about this problem?
--
Tomas Styblo <tripie@...n.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists