[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080722071324.GA2664@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:13:24 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: add apic probe for genapic 64bit v2
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > v2: fix compiling when CONFIG_ACPI is not set
>
> applied to tip/x86/x2apic - thanks Yinghai.
>
> > +static struct genapic *apic_probe[] __initdata = {
> > + &apic_x2apic_uv_x,
> > + &apic_x2apic_phys,
> > + &apic_x2apic_cluster,
> > + &apic_physflat,
> > + NULL,
> > +};
>
> very nice generalization!
btw.:
apic_probe[i]->acpi_madt_oem_check
should probably be renamed to something more neutral like "->probe" -
there's nothing ACPI about it and some weird boxes could use PCI or
other probing mechanisms to discover the type of APIC they want to use.
plus i guess genapic_32.h and genapic_64.h should be unified and struct
apic_ops should be put into struct genapic?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists