[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080722112535.GC3081@hack.voiplan.pt>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:25:35 +0100
From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@....de>, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, jdike@...toit.com
Subject: Re: [Patch] um: fix a build error
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:53:54AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@....de>
>>
>> --- linux-2.6/arch/um/drivers/line.c.orig 2008-07-22 12:06:17.000000000 +0200
>> +++ linux-2.6/arch/um/drivers/line.c 2008-07-22 12:06:49.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -362,10 +362,8 @@ static irqreturn_t line_write_interrupt(
>> if (tty == NULL)
>> return IRQ_NONE;
>>
>> - if (test_bit(TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP, &tty->flags) &&
>> - (tty->ldisc.write_wakeup != NULL))
>> - (tty->ldisc.write_wakeup)(tty);
>> -
>> + if (test_bit(TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP, &tty->flags))
>> + tty_wakeup(tty);
>
>Sorry I should have been clearer - you don't want the test_bit either.
>
Sure, tty_wakeup() already does that test.
And, tty_wakeup() also does wake_up_interruptible(), so I think
the wake_up_interruptible() below can also be removed, probably.
Thanks.
--
The opposite of love is not hate, but indifference.
--Elie Wiesel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists