[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080722134601.GA21977@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:46:01 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>,
Ivan Seskar <Seskar@...lab.rutgers.edu>,
jfm3 <jfm3@...lab.rutgers.edu>, Sujith <m.sujith@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Bug on 2.6.26 - x86 VIA Nehemiah CentaurHauls processor cannot
boot
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> Not a bug.
>>
>> it would still be nice to get a nice printk and panic during bootup
>> instead of some obscure crash, hm?
>>
>
> Yes. The fundamental problem is that Centaur has a set of CPUs which
> report family == 6 but don't have the long NOP instructions. We would
> need an exact CPUID criterion for these CPUs in order to be able to
> report it as an error. An alternative would be to attempt trapping in
> the real-mode code (#UD is one of the *very* few CPU exceptions which
> can be reliably captured in real mode on a BIOS system), but doing so
> would probably mean breaking Loadlin at the very least.
>
> We can't "printk and panic" because we never get that far in the
> kernel proper, for obvious reasons: the code is quite littered with
> these buggers.
hm. How about to default to a safe NOP all the way up to where we can
fix up alternatives and install a different NOP. (which we could also
test first via intentionally jumping on it and catching any exception
via a special exception handler)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists