lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080722135723.GA23077@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:57:23 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [TCP bug] stuck distcc connections in latest -git


* David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com> wrote:

> > The hung condition seemed permanent (i waited a couple of minutes).
> 
> Not nearly long enough.  Retransmits can be sent as infrequently as 
> per 180 seconds.  I think there's an argument to use one of the the 
> various patches that reduce your TCP_RTO_MAX, for example OBATA 
> Noboru's (http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=118422471428855): you 
> don't have to wait unreasonably long before seeing a retransmit.  
> Remember, three minutes!

i know, i waited much more than 180 minutes - about 15 minutes. That is 
more than enough for this LAN connection.

It's all on the LAN directly via a single gigabit switch and no packet 
dropping. I noticed the hung build immediately as it happened.

> > I retried the same build 10 times and it would not reproduce - so 
> > this again is a hard to reproduce condition. (and there's no chance 
> > to get a proper tcpdump either, at these traffic levels)
> 
> You really should start that capture, and on both client and server. 
> You don't need to dump everything, only traffic to or from 
> server:distcc.

It's not feasible. That box did in excess of 200 GB of network traffic 
in the past 7 hours alone. ~10 clients are doing make -j200 type of 
kernel builds to this 16way buildbox so it is not realistic to tcpdump 
it - especially given the rarity of this problem. (it has not reoccured 
since then) The network is local LAN, gigabit ethernet over a single 
gigabit switch.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ