[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0807212232001.5882-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:37:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
cc: Tomas Styblo <tripie@...n.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] JMicron JM20337 USB-SATA data corruption bugfix - device
152d:2338
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Robert Hancock wrote:
> (adding CCs)
>
> Tomas Styblo wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > this message includes a patch that provides a workaround for
> > a silent data corruption bug caused by incorrect error handling in
> > the JMicron JM20337 Hi-Speed USB to SATA & PATA Combo Bridge chipset,
> > USB device id 152d:2338.
The two of you should read through
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9638
which concerns this very problem.
> > - the problem occurs quite rarely, approx. once for
> > every 20 GB of transfered data during heavy load
> >
> > - it seems that only read operations are affected
> >
> > - the problem is accompanied by these messages in syslog each
> > time it occurs:
> >
> > May 17 15:06:56 kernel: sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] Sense Key : 0x0 [current]
> > May 17 15:06:56 kernel: sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] ASC=0x0 ASCQ=0x0
> >
> > - the bug is not detected as an error and incorrect data is returned,
> > causing insidious data corruption
> >
> > - tested with 3 external disk enclosures (Akasa Integral AK-ENP2SATA-BL)
> > with different disks on different computers, with kernel 2.6.24 and 2.6.25
> >
> > - the patch provides a crude workaround by detecting the error condition
> > and retrying the faulty transfer
> >
> >
> > The fix needs a review as I don't know much about USB and SCSI.
> > It's possible that this approach is wrong and that the problem should
> > be fixed somewhere else.
> >
> > There are other problems with this chipset that make it necessary
> > to disconnect and power off the enclosure from time to time, but at least
> > there's no data corruption anymore.
>
> I'm not sure this is a good approach. More that this code right above in
> usb_stor_invoke_transport, which your code undoes the effect of for this
> device, doesn't seem right:
>
> /* If things are really okay, then let's show that. Zero
> * out the sense buffer so the higher layers won't realize
> * we did an unsolicited auto-sense. */
> if (result == USB_STOR_TRANSPORT_GOOD &&
> /* Filemark 0, ignore EOM, ILI 0, no sense */
> (srb->sense_buffer[2] & 0xaf) == 0 &&
> /* No ASC or ASCQ */
> srb->sense_buffer[12] == 0 &&
> srb->sense_buffer[13] == 0) {
> srb->result = SAM_STAT_GOOD;
> srb->sense_buffer[0] = 0x0;
> }
>
> So if the transport initially gets a failure, but then request sense
> doesn't show any error, we just go "hmm, guess it was ok after all".
> That seems kind of dangerous, I shouldn't think we should assume a
No, no -- you have misread the code. If the transport initially got a
failure then result would be equal to USB_STOR_TRANSPORT_FAILED, not
USB_STOR_TRANSPORT_GOOD, so this code wouldn't run.
> If you just delete that code above, does the corruption go away?
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists