linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c: Add local_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807222115210.2670@ask.diku.dk>
Date:	Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:18:27 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To:	Simon Holm Thøgersen <odie@...aau.dk>
Cc:	avi@...ranet.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, xiantao.zhang@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c: Add local_irq_restore in
 error handling code

On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Simon Holm Thøgersen wrote:

> tir, 22 07 2008 kl. 18:44 +0200, skrev Julia Lawall:
> > From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> > 
> > There is a call to local_irq_restore in the normal exit case, so it would
> > seem that there should be one on an error return as well.
> > 
> > The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
> > (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
> > 
> > // <smpl>
> > @@
> > expression l;
> > expression E,E1,E2;
> > @@
> > 
> > local_irq_save(l);
> > ... when != local_irq_restore(l)
> >     when != spin_unlock_irqrestore(E,l)
> >     when any
> >     when strict
> > (
> > if (...) { ... when != local_irq_restore(l)
> >                when != spin_unlock_irqrestore(E1,l)
> > +   local_irq_restore(l);
> >     return ...;
> > }
> > |
> > if (...)
> > +   {local_irq_restore(l);
> >     return ...;
> > +   }
> > |
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(E2,l);
> > |
> > local_irq_restore(l);
> > )
> > // </smpl>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> > 
> > ---
> >  arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c      |    9 +++++++--
> >  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c
> > index 318b811..14e5c99 100644
> > --- a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c
> > +++ b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c
> > @@ -125,8 +125,10 @@ void kvm_arch_hardware_enable(void *garbage)
> >  				PAGE_KERNEL));
> >  	local_irq_save(saved_psr);
> >  	slot = ia64_itr_entry(0x3, KVM_VMM_BASE, pte, KVM_VMM_SHIFT);
> > -	if (slot < 0)
> > +	if (slot < 0) {
> > +		local_irq_restore(saved_psr);
> >  		return;
> > +	}
> >  	local_irq_restore(saved_psr);
> 
> If this change makes sense, how about merging the two local_irq_restore
> calls and put them before the if? And shouldn't your checker be able to
> figure this?

No, it pretty much only does what it's told, which is to put a
local_irq_restore before the return.  

Since slot is a local variable, it does seem like the call to 
local_irq_restore could be safely moved upwards, so I will do that 
instead.

thanks,
julia