[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080722134909.2cbf719b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:49:09 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, andi@...stfloor.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, steiner@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 00/26] x64, x2apic/intr-remap: Interrupt-remapping and
x2apic support
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:53:20 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> For review and testing purposes i've created a new topic branch for
> this: tip/x86/x2apic and have picked up your patches into it.
This has today turned up in linux-next and I'm having to rework 2.6.27
patches to compensate for it.
Which means that I now need to wait until this work goes into mainline
before I can merge those patches or I need to undo those fixes, route
around Suresh's changes and then force you to fix the resulting damage.
What's the score here? Is this stuff going into 2.6.27?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists