[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080723114914.GF4561@ff.dom.local>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:49:14 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Larry.Finger@...inger.net,
kaber@...sh.net, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Kernel WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1330
__netif_schedule+0x2c/0x98()
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:35:19AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:58:16PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
...
> > When I look at the mac802.11 code in ieee80211_tx_pending() it looks
> > like it can do with just one lock at a time, instead of all - but I
> > might be missing some obvious details.
> >
> > So I guess my question is, is netif_tx_lock() here to stay, or is the
> > right fix to convert all those drivers to use __netif_tx_lock() which
> > locks only a single queue?
> >
>
> It's a new thing mainly for new hardware/drivers, and just after
> conversion (older drivers effectively use __netif_tx_lock()), so it'll
> probably stay for some time until something better is found. David,
> will tell the rest, I hope.
...And, of course, these new drivers should also lock a single queue
where possible.
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists