linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080723143411.GA2905@tv-sign.ru>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:34:11 +0400
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To:	Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <daniel@...ac.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	xemul@...nvz.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace

On 07/17, Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
>
> +int task_in_pid_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns)
> +{
> +	struct pid *pid = task_pid(tsk);
> +
> +	if (!pid)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (pid->level < ns->level)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (pid->numbers[ns->level].ns != ns)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +
>  static __init int pid_namespaces_init(void)
>  {
>  	pid_ns_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(pid_namespace, SLAB_PANIC);
> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> index 6c0958e..93713a5 100644
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -1145,7 +1145,8 @@ static int kill_something_info(int sig, struct 
> siginfo *info, int pid)
>  		struct task_struct * p;
> 
>  		for_each_process(p) {
> -			if (p->pid > 1 && !same_thread_group(p, current)) {
> +			if (p->pid > 1 && !same_thread_group(p, current) &&
> +			    task_in_pid_ns(p, current->nsproxy->pid_ns)) {
>  				int err = group_send_sig_info(sig, info, p);
>  				++count;
>  				if (err != -EPERM)

Do we really need all these complications? Afaics, we can make
a simpler patch,

	--- kernel/signal.c
	+++ kernel/signal.c
	@@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ static int kill_something_info(int sig, 
			struct task_struct * p;
	 
			for_each_process(p) {
	-			if (p->pid > 1 && !same_thread_group(p, current)) {
	+			if (task_pid_vnr(p) > 1 && !same_thread_group(p, current)) {
					int err = group_send_sig_info(sig, info, p);
					++count;
					if (err != -EPERM)


task_pid_vnr(p) returns 0 if "p" is not visible from the current's
namespace. "> 1" ensures we don't kill the child reaper as well.

No?

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/