| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2c0942db0807230909l1e38ed97x9f5ce510dc0dcdd7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:09:40 -0700 From: "Ray Lee" <ray-lk@...rabbit.org> To: "Eric Paris" <eparis@...hat.com> Cc: malware-list@...ts.printk.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: request for comment: generic kernel interface for malware vendors On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com> wrote: > 1 - ****hooks, basics, infrastructure > 2 - configuration generic stuff for the other patches > 3 - ****results caching > 4 - exclusions based on the operation or filetype > 5 - per process exclusions > 6 - filesystem type exclusions > 7 - patch exclusions, don't scan when accessed through certain path > 8 - patch inclusions, only scanning selected things > 9 - ****userspace vetting, the big stuff > 10 - operating when userspace is broken If, along the way, you can also address the needs provided by the fschange patches (system-wide inotify, in essence, without having to register individual watches), that'd be gravy. I haven't looked at either the patches above or the fsnotify ones, so I can't speak to whatever overlap they may have, except that it certainly seems like the anti-malware stuff would be a superset. http://stefan.buettcher.org/cs/fschange/index.html ~r. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists