[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080723012611.GB28486@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:26:11 -0400
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
To: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>
Cc: penberg@...helsinki.fi, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rdunlap@...otime.net, mpm@...enic.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] kmemtrace: Core implementation.
Hi -
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 03:50:02AM +0300, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> [...] Sounds like a good idea, but I'd like to get rid of markers
> and use Mathieu Desnoyers' tracepoints instead. I'm just waiting for
> tracepoints to get closer to inclusion in mainline/-mm.
OK.
> It would be great if tracepoints completely replaced markers, so
> SystemTap would use those instead.
Raw tracepoints are problematic as they require a per-tracepoint C
function signature to be synthesized by the tool (or hard-coded in the
tool or elsewhere). We haven't worked out how best do to this. OTOH,
markers don't require such hard-coding, so are simpler for a general
tool to interface to.
> However, if tracepoints are not ready when kmemtrace is to be merged,
> I'll take your advice and mention markers and SystemTap.
Thanks either way - I'm glad you found an existing tracing mechanism
usable and didn't choose/need to invent your own.
- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists