[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080723171841.815234000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:18:41 -0700
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] cpumask: Change cpumask_of_cpu to use cpumask_of_cpu_map
The following patch is submitted to resolve this problem...
(Based on tip/master. I will generate a linux-next version if requested
since it now has generic code that will be executed for non-x86 arch's.)
> * Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
>
> >> > > I wouldn't mind it at all, and since it's almost always calling a
> >> > > function that requires a cpumask_t pointer (like the cpu_* ops or
> >> > > set_cpus_allowed_ptr) then there shouldn't be too many "pointer
> >> > > dereference" penalties. I'm just always a bit hesitant to make too
> >> > > many generic changes since I have only x86 and ia64 machines to test
> >> > > with.
> > >
> > > The simple version is just a static array of [NR_CPUS] cpumask_t's.
> > > Do that, with an override for smarter archs?
> > >
> > > I really REALLY prefer that over the fairly tortuous macros.
>
> a fresh commit in -git has exposed the topology.h mess - see the hack
> below. We now have diverging versions of topology_core_siblings()
> semantics - that sure cannot be right. Mike?
>
> Ingo
>
> ------->
> commit 695a6b456307455a10059512208e8ed0d376ecd3
> Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Date: Wed Jul 23 13:19:44 2008 +0200
>
> topology: work around topology_core_siblings() breakage
>
> work around:
>
> drivers/net/sfc/efx.c: In function â??efx_probe_interrupts':
> drivers/net/sfc/efx.c:845: error: lvalue required as unary â??&' operand
>
> the topology API is a mess right now ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> ---
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
---
The following cross built successfully:
x86_64-default
x86_64-single
x86_64-8psmp
x86_64-debug
x86_64-numa
i386-default
i386-single
i386-smp
ia64-sn2
ia64-default
ia64-nosmp
ia64-zx1
s390-default
arm-default
sparc-default
sparc64-default
sparc64-smp
mips-default
ppc-pmac32
These had problems:
ppc-iseries
Build failed Wed Jul 23 10:10:10 PDT 2008
:0: error: -m64 not supported in this configuration
:0: error: -m64 not supported in this configuration
:0: error: -m64 not supported in this configuration
ppc64
Build failed Wed Jul 23 10:10:19 PDT 2008
:0: error: -m64 not supported in this configuration
:0: error: -m64 not supported in this configuration
:0: error: -m64 not supported in this configuration
ppc-pseries
Build failed Wed Jul 23 10:10:29 PDT 2008
:0: error: -m64 not supported in this configuration
:0: error: -m64 not supported in this configuration
:0: error: -m64 not supported in this configuration
ppc-smp
Build failed Wed Jul 23 10:12:03 PDT 2008
CC drivers/scsi/scsi_error.o
BOOTCC arch/powerpc/boot/libfdt/fdt_strerror.o
make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/boot/uImage] Error 127
ps3_defconfig
Build failed Wed Jul 23 10:12:18 PDT 2008
:0: error: -m64 not supported in this configuration
:0: error: -m64 not supported in this configuration
:0: error: -m64 not supported in this configuration
powerpc-allmodconfig
Build failed Wed Jul 23 10:12:31 PDT 2008
:0: error: -m64 not supported in this configuration
:0: error: -m64 not supported in this configuration
:0: error: -m64 not supported in this configuration
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists