[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200807231136.26115.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:36:25 -0700
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
LM Sensors <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>,
"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...utronix.de>, hmh@....eng.br,
mgross@...ux.intel.com, Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc)
On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> * Software ring buffer support to allow semi regular capture of data form the
> device. Typically this will be driven from either datardy events, or from
> a periodic timer interrupt (to this end a very simple wrapper for periodic
> RTC's is included. This will move to more generic timer interfaces as and when
> they become available. For now available rtc's must be registered with the
> subsystem via the industrialio_register_ptimer function form within a board
> init.
Could you elaborate a bit on why you'd want hardware supported
periodic timers, rather than either an hrtimer or a timer?
Maybe provide some real-world scenarios where those software
abstractions are inappropriate.
I can imagine numerous reasons, but those might not be yours...
- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists