[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080723.131607.79681752.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jarkao2@...il.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, Larry.Finger@...inger.net, kaber@...sh.net,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Kernel WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1330
__netif_schedule+0x2c/0x98()
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:49:14 +0000
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:35:19AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:58:16PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> ...
> > > When I look at the mac802.11 code in ieee80211_tx_pending() it looks
> > > like it can do with just one lock at a time, instead of all - but I
> > > might be missing some obvious details.
> > >
> > > So I guess my question is, is netif_tx_lock() here to stay, or is the
> > > right fix to convert all those drivers to use __netif_tx_lock() which
> > > locks only a single queue?
> > >
> >
> > It's a new thing mainly for new hardware/drivers, and just after
> > conversion (older drivers effectively use __netif_tx_lock()), so it'll
> > probably stay for some time until something better is found. David,
> > will tell the rest, I hope.
>
> ...And, of course, these new drivers should also lock a single queue
> where possible.
It isn't going away.
There will always be a need for a "stop all the TX queues" operation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists