linux-kernel - Re: [stable] [patch 44/47] pxamci: fix byte aligned DMA transfers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
cc:	pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
	Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
	Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Jake Edge <jake@....net>,
	Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>, stable@...nel.org,
	Rodrigo Rubira Branco <rbranco@...checkpoint.com>,
	Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>
Subject: Re: [stable] [patch 44/47] pxamci: fix byte aligned DMA transfers



On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Greg KH wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:01:34AM +0200, pHilipp Zabel wrote:
> > 
> > There is an ugly typo in the patch below that was fixed by Karl Beldan:
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/drzeus/mmc.git;a=commit;h=28bbe535df5c461c25eb57affb30e007072429c3
> > 
> > Not sure how you handle this, maybe this patch should only go in
> > together with the other.
> 
> As the above mentioned patch isn't in Linus's tree yet, I can't take it.
> 
> Care to send it to stable@...nel.org when it does go in?  Or is this
> current patch just broken without it and not worth adding at all?

Hmm. I think it's commit 4fe16897c59882420d66f2d503106653d026ed6c 
upstream. I don't know why it has a different SHA1 in the mmc tree, but I 
assume that it's because the MMC tree has rebased at some point. Ugh.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/