[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <524f69650807231722q74269919s4fcf95d51d438ff4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:22:47 -0500
From: "Steve French" <smfrench@...il.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: new sparse warnings
Any idea what the new sparse "context imbalance" warnings are? Is
this a bug in sparse?
stevef@...-t60p:~/kernels/cifs-2.6-devel> make modules C=1
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
CHECK fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
fs/cifs/cifssmb.c:134:2: warning: context imbalance in
'mark_open_files_invalid': wrong count at exit
fs/cifs/cifssmb.c:134:2: context 'lock': wanted 0, got 1
fs/cifs/cifssmb.c:5191:9: warning: context imbalance in
'CIFSSMBNotify': wrong count at exit
fs/cifs/cifssmb.c:5191:9: context 'lock': wanted 0, got 1
CC [M] fs/cifs/cifssmb.o
The functions it is complaining about don't seem to have a "context
imbalance" see e.g.the one near line 134 of fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
static void mark_open_files_invalid(struct cifsTconInfo *pTcon)
{
struct cifsFileInfo *open_file = NULL;
struct list_head *tmp;
struct list_head *tmp1;
/* list all files open on tree connection and mark them invalid */
write_lock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
list_for_each_safe(tmp, tmp1, &pTcon->openFileList) {
open_file = list_entry(tmp, struct cifsFileInfo, tlist);
if (open_file)
open_file->invalidHandle = true;
}
write_unlock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
}
--
Thanks,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists