lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:32:23 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org> Subject: Re: x86: split spinlock implementations out into their own files * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote: > ftrace requires certain low-level code, like spinlocks and timestamps, > to be compiled without -pg in order to avoid infinite recursion. This > patch splits out the core paravirt spinlocks and the Xen spinlocks > into separate files which can be compiled without -pg. > > Also do xen/time.c while we're about it. As a result, we can now use > ftrace within a Xen domain. applied to x86/spinlocks, thanks Jeremy. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists