linux-kernel - Re: 22bb1be4d27... breaks hal (and NM)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:33:52 +0100
From:	Alistair John Strachan <alistair@...zero.co.uk>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Jean Tourrilhes <jt@....hp.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 22bb1be4d27... breaks hal (and NM)

On Thursday 24 July 2008 13:11:13 Andrew Morton wrote:
> : +	  Say Y if you have programs using it (we don't know of any).

Probably would have been less confusing if the Kconfig message actually lined 
up with the note about older HALs in feature-removal-schedule.txt. Saying "we 
don't know of any" seems inaccurate. This should really be something 
like "old HAL versions" or perhaps even better "HAL <= X.Y.Z".

I'm sure distributors will have the common sense to stop enabling the option 
in the future. In the mean time, removing the deceptive summary would 
hopefully avoid such bug reports.

-- 
Cheers,
Alistair.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/