[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1216907931.7257.333.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:58:51 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Rafal Wijata (NULL)" <devnull@...ata.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Odd swapping issue
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 15:45 +0200, Rafal Wijata (NULL) wrote:
> OK, things are little more clear now I suppose.
>
> I tried (just for fun) echo 8 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
> and it happened again, and no hugepages were allocated of course.
>
> But this brought the following to my mind.
>
> Since it's nfs server/client, and the nfs is rather heavily utilized(at
> least sometimes), maybe nfsd tasks were unable to find long enough lowmem
> chunk. How can we get such ram? By sweeping pages out to swap, isn't it?
>
> Now the question is, if Linux actually has such feature like blind swapping
> out if lowmem is too fragmented to find requested size?
> Can anybody confirm or negate?
Well, not blind - we have lumpy reclaim that tries to focus on the right
spot for large order allocations. However there are a myrad of
conditions that can make it impossible to reclaim certain pages,
therefore defeating this strategy.
> Next, I was thinking then I could run 64bit system, but I don't want to
> reinstall it. Anybody knows if it's possible to have installed 32bit OS, but
> run 64bit kernel alone(no 64bit glibc or anything else)?
Yes running as I type ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists