linux-kernel - Re: [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0807250025080.11551@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:25:49 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To:	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...il.com>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	LM Sensors <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>,
	"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...utronix.de>, hmh@....eng.br,
	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>, mgross@...ux.intel.com,
	Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>,
	Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/4] IndustrialIO subsystem (ADCs, accelerometers etc)


On Wednesday 2008-07-23 19:00, Jonathan Cameron wrote:

>Dear All,
>
>The need for an industrialio subsystem was discussed in
>http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/20/135
>
>Firstly thanks to all the people who have contributed to the discussion
>of this in the past.
>
>In brief the intention is provide a kernel subsystem directed towards the
>handling on sensors (and later related output devices) such as ADC's,
>accelerometers and many others.

Could this be done using UIO instead?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/