linux-kernel - Re: Kernel WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1330 __netif

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080724.022040.23129457.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	peterz@...radead.org
Cc:	jarkao2@...il.com, Larry.Finger@...inger.net, kaber@...sh.net,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Kernel WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1330
 __netif_schedule+0x2c/0x98()

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:10:48 +0200

> Ok, then how about something like this, the idea is to wrap the per tx
> lock with a read lock of the device and let the netif_tx_lock() be the
> write side, therefore excluding all device locks, but not incure the
> cacheline bouncing on the read side by using per-cpu counters like rcu
> does.
> 
> This of course requires that netif_tx_lock() is rare, otherwise stuff
> will go bounce anyway...
> 
> Probably missed a few details,.. but I think the below ought to show the
> idea...

Thanks for the effort, but I don't think we can seriously consider
this.

This lock is taken for every packet transmitted by the system, adding
another memory reference (the RCU deref) and a counter bump is just
not something we can just add to placate lockdep.  We going through
all of this effort to seperate the TX locking into individual
queues, it would be silly to go back and make it more expensive.

I have other ideas which I've expanded upon in other emails.  They
involve creating a netif_tx_freeze() interface and getting the drivers
to start using it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/