[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1216974440.11188.100.camel@pasglop>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:27:20 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@...l.net>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Linux-rt <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ppc <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
Tim Chavez <tinytim@...ibm.com>,
Jean Pierre Dion <jean-pierre.dion@...l.net>,
Gilles Carry <Gilles.Carry@....bull.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2][RT] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix
tree lockless
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 09:49 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>
> The only advantage of the concurrent radix tree over this model is that
> it can potentially do multiple modification operations at the same time.
Yup, we do not need that for the irq revmap... concurrent lookup is all we need.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists