[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080725083448.GE8301@fluff.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:34:48 +0100
From: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: bzolnier@...il.com, harvey.harrison@...il.com,
linux-ide@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: recent IDE regression
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:38:31PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> After today's IDE merge my sparc64 workstation stopped booting.
>
> It's due to this change:
>
> commit 7fa897b91a3ea0f16c2873b869d7a0eef05acff4
> Author: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
> Date: Thu Jul 24 22:53:34 2008 +0200
>
> ide: trivial sparse annotations
>
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
>
> Heh, "trivial", indeed.
>
> Specifically, this part of the change:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c b/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c
> index 07da5fb..8aae917 100644
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c
> @@ -510,10 +510,8 @@ void ide_fixstring (u8 *s, const int bytecount, const int byteswap)
>
> if (byteswap) {
> /* convert from big-endian to host byte order */
> - for (p = end ; p != s;) {
> - unsigned short *pp = (unsigned short *) (p -= 2);
> - *pp = ntohs(*pp);
> - }
> + for (p = end ; p != s;)
> + be16_to_cpus((u16 *)(p -= 2));
personally, i would much prefer to see the loop being less evil
like:
for (p = s; p < end; p += 2)
be16_to_cpus((u16 *)p);
is there an architecture/compiler combo which really makes this
evil worthwile? on arm (gcc 4.2), both evaluate to the same number of
instructions.
> }
> /* strip leading blanks */
> while (s != end && *s == ' ')
>
> On big-endian, be16_to_cpus() (via __be16_to_cpus()) is:
>
> do { } while (0)
>
> which therefore does not evaluate the argument, and thus this loop
> will make no forward progress.
>
> Probably the fix is in be16_to_cpus(), making it do something like
> "(void) (x);" in the do/while body.
>
> Something like this:
>
> endian: Always evaluate arguments.
>
> Changeset 7fa897b91a3ea0f16c2873b869d7a0eef05acff4
> ("ide: trivial sparse annotations") created an IDE bootup
> regression on big-endian systems. In drivers/ide/ide-iops.c,
> function ide_fixstring() we now have the loop:
>
> for (p = end ; p != s;)
> be16_to_cpus((u16 *)(p -= 2));
>
> which will never terminate on big-endian because in such
> a configuration be16_to_cpus() evaluates to "do { } while (0)"
>
> Therefore, always evaluate the arguments to nop endian transformation
> operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h b/include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h
> index 961ed4b..44f95b9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h
> +++ b/include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h
> @@ -94,12 +94,12 @@ static inline __u16 __be16_to_cpup(const __be16 *p)
> #define __le32_to_cpus(x) __swab32s((x))
> #define __cpu_to_le16s(x) __swab16s((x))
> #define __le16_to_cpus(x) __swab16s((x))
> -#define __cpu_to_be64s(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __be64_to_cpus(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __cpu_to_be32s(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __be32_to_cpus(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __cpu_to_be16s(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __be16_to_cpus(x) do {} while (0)
> +#define __cpu_to_be64s(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __be64_to_cpus(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __cpu_to_be32s(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __be32_to_cpus(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __cpu_to_be16s(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __be16_to_cpus(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
>
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
> #include <linux/byteorder/generic.h>
> diff --git a/include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h b/include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h
> index 05dc7c3..4cc170a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h
> +++ b/include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h
> @@ -88,12 +88,12 @@ static inline __u16 __be16_to_cpup(const __be16 *p)
> {
> return __swab16p((__u16 *)p);
> }
> -#define __cpu_to_le64s(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __le64_to_cpus(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __cpu_to_le32s(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __le32_to_cpus(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __cpu_to_le16s(x) do {} while (0)
> -#define __le16_to_cpus(x) do {} while (0)
> +#define __cpu_to_le64s(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __le64_to_cpus(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __cpu_to_le32s(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __le32_to_cpus(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __cpu_to_le16s(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> +#define __le16_to_cpus(x) do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> #define __cpu_to_be64s(x) __swab64s((x))
> #define __be64_to_cpus(x) __swab64s((x))
> #define __cpu_to_be32s(x) __swab32s((x))
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Ben (ben@...ff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists