[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080725110438.463d0f04@halley.suse.de>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:04:38 +0200
From: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
To: Gabor Gombas <gombasg@...aki.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: Solid freezes with 2.6.25
* Gabor Gombas [2008-07-25 10:52]:
>
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 07:11:41PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 04:39:29PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 02:21:46PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well, can you try if that really not happens without
> > > > CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC? The question is if that 64 interrupts per second really
> > > > cause a machine hang ...
> > >
> > > I'll try when I have a little time...
> >
> > Ok, it took much more time than I'd have liked, but now I'm having:
> >
> > $ uname -a
> > Linux boogie 2.6.25 #3 SMP Thu Jun 12 13:32:35 CEST 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > $ grep EMULATE_RTC /boot/config-2.6.25
> > # CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC is not set
> > $ uptime
> > 19:07:17 up 3 days, 4:07, 12 users, load average: 0.14, 0.31, 0.20
> >
> > So I'd say it works.
>
> FYI, the bug is still present in 2.6.26. I also got the same hang on a
> Dell PowerEdge 850 using a Debian-provided kernel (based on 2.6.25.6);
> that is the 3rd distinct HW configuration that hangs.
Did you try that patch?
-------------- 8< ---------------------------------------------------
From: David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Resolve http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11051 and other bugs
related to the way the HPET glue code in rtc-cmos was incomplete and
inconsistent:
* Switch the approach so that the basic driver code flow isn't
changed by having HPET ... instead, just have HPET shadow the
RTC_CONTROL irq enables and RTC_FREQ_SELECT data. It's only
coping with IRQ thievery, after all.
* Do that consistently (!!) to avoid problems when the HPET code
is out of sync with the real RTC intent. Examples include:
- cmos_procfs(), which now reports correct data
- cmos_irq_set_state() ... also removing the previous PIE_{ON,OFF}
ioctl support so only one code path manages "periodic" IRQs
- cmos_do_shutdown() ... currently a "just in case" change.
- cmos_suspend() and cmos_resume() ... also handling a bug that
was specific to HPET's IRQ thievery, where the alarm wasn't
disabled after waking the system
* Always call that HPET code under the RTC spinlock (it doesn't do
its own locking)
-------------- >8 ---------------------------------------------------
Bernhard
--
Bernhard Walle, SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Architecture Development
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists