linux-kernel - Re: post 2.6.26 requires pciehp_slot_with

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080725111851.GB6701@parisc-linux.org>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jul 2008 05:18:51 -0600
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>,
	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: post 2.6.26 requires pciehp_slot_with_bus

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 02:38:38PM +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
> >The hard part is figuring out a convention that we can all agree
> >on. ;) I've no strong feelings here, but of the options
> >presented, I lean towards "2a", "2b" or "2-1", "2-2".
> >
> 
> Only my hope is I don't want to look "2a" or "2-1" on normal platform.
> It should be "2" on normal platform.

Yes, the first slot will be "2", the second slot "2a" or "2-1" or
whatever we decide.  I don't have a strong feeling about the name.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/