| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:08:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
cc: Grant Coady <gcoady.lk@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: how much stuff is no longer "EXPERIMENTAL"?
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
> > legitimately experimental content in the source tree. surely
> > *some* of that is suitably mature such that that dependency can be
> > dropped.
>
> What is the connection between age of code and experimental status ?
perhaps nothing, perhaps lots. *of course* there can be features
that are both long-lived and still experimental. just as, of course,
there is stuff that was (properly) tagged as EXPERIMENTAL ages ago
that has long since stabilized and can afford to stop being
experimental.
just a small nagging for folks to take a quick look at what no
longer needs to be tagged that way, that's all.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists