| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20080725233325W.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:32:55 +0900 From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> To: joerg.roedel@....com Cc: fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, bhavna.sarathy@....com, robert.richter@....com Subject: Re: [PATCH] add iommu_num_pages helper function On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:14:25 +0200 Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com> wrote: > > > If not, I suggest that we (you?) introduce one in a follow-on patch > > > series and fix the iommu_num_pages function then. > > > > That's fine by me. Or I could try to find a solution and submit new > > patchset with your AMD and GART patches. > > Thats also possible. But I prefer to fix that incrementally and merge > this first step. > > > BTW, I prefer to push this patchset via -mm rather than x86 since > > after all we need to clean up all the IOMMUs. > > Push it through -mm would make sense since it touches generic code in > lib/. On the other side in x86 we would avoid merge conflicts with > updates in AMD IOMMU and GART code. Ok, I have no preference. It's not urgent and I can work on this later on. I leave it to you and x86 maintainers. Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists