[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <488A1CB6.5090707@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:34:30 +0200
From: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: PAGE_ALIGN() compile breakage
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:14:55 +0300 Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> Ideally, all headers should be self-contained. IOW, they should #include
>> everything they use.
>
> Yup. And the core reason for our headers mess is that the headers do
> too much stuff, and cnosequently demand a large dependency trail.
>
>> But TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE in asm/processor.h on some architectures uses
>> PAGE_ALIGN() that got moved from asm/page.h to linux/mm.h .
>
> Probably mm.h should be split up - put the simple things (usually
> declarations) into one "early" header file and leave the more
> heavyweight things (usually implementations) in mm.h.
IMHO splitting mm.h is probably the best solution. If I'm not wrong
Paul (CCed) already suggested to move the stuff like PAGE_ALIGN() outside
mm.h the first time I submitted this patch.
In this way we could even include the "lightweight" mm.h (mm_define.h??)
in all the asm-*/page.h, preserving also the backward compatibility.
-Andrea
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists